FNF
Price
$47.95
Change
+$1.01 (+2.15%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.91B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HIPO
Price
$26.34
Change
+$0.56 (+2.17%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
685.53M
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNF vs HIPO

FNF vs HIPO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNF vs. HIPO commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNF is a Buy and HIPO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FNF: $46.94 vs. HIPO: $25.78)
Brand notoriety: FNF and HIPO are both not notable
FNF represents the Specialty Insurance, while HIPO is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNF: 80% vs. HIPO: 84%
Market capitalization -- FNF: $12.91B vs. HIPO: $671.21M
FNF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $12.91B. HIPO’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $671.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $12.91B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $126.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.69B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $12.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNF is a better buy in the long-term than HIPO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIPO is a better buy in the short-term than FNF.

Price Growth

FNF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +2.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNF is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

HIPO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+1.27% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.83% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNF($12.9B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($686M). FNF has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: FNF (16.70) vs HIPO (5.86). FNF YTD gains are higher at: -12.119 vs. HIPO (-14.295). HIPO has less debt than FNF: HIPO (51.5M) vs FNF (4.77B). FNF has higher revenues than HIPO: FNF (14.6B) vs HIPO (480M).
FNFHIPOFNF / HIPO
Capitalization12.9B686M1,880%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.119-14.29585%
P/E Ratio16.705.86285%
Revenue14.6B480M3,042%
Total CashN/A520M-
Total Debt4.77B51.5M9,260%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNF: Fundamental Ratings
FNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNFHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HIPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRVI17.700.49
+2.85%
Trevi Therapeutics
RZLT5.150.13
+2.59%
Rezolute
CRBG29.09-0.09
-0.31%
Corebridge Financial
GOSS0.16N/A
-2.26%
Gossamer Bio
NCRA0.11-0.01
-6.80%
Nocera

HIPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIPO has been loosely correlated with LMND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HIPO jumps, then LMND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIPO
1D Price
Change %
HIPO100%
-0.69%
LMND - HIPO
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
PRCH - HIPO
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
ROOT - HIPO
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
AIZ - HIPO
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
FNF - HIPO
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More