FAF
Price
$73.26
Change
-$0.60 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 17, 12:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.54B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HIPO
Price
$33.06
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Aug 17, 12:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
871.91M
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FAF vs HIPO

FAF vs HIPO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAF vs. HIPO commentary
Aug 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAF is a Hold and HIPO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2026
Stock price -- (FAF: $73.86 vs. HIPO: $33.04)
Brand notoriety: FAF and HIPO are both not notable
FAF represents the Specialty Insurance, while HIPO is part of the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAF: 49% vs. HIPO: 72%
Market capitalization -- FAF: $7.54B vs. HIPO: $871.91M
FAF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $7.54B. HIPO’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $871.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $13.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $132.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $4.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIPO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIPO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FAF and HIPO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIPO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HIPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIPO is a better buy in the short-term than FAF.

Price Growth

FAF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а -0.49% price change this week, while HIPO (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

HIPO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+0.36% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.60% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAF($7.54B) has a higher market cap than HIPO($872M). FAF has higher P/E ratio than HIPO: FAF (10.24) vs HIPO (7.01). FAF YTD gains are higher at: 22.204 vs. HIPO (9.840). FAF has more cash in the bank: 2.73B vs. HIPO (445M). HIPO has less debt than FAF: HIPO (50.7M) vs FAF (2.79B). FAF has higher revenues than HIPO: FAF (7.98B) vs HIPO (507M).
FAFHIPOFAF / HIPO
Capitalization7.54B872M865%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.2049.840226%
P/E Ratio10.247.01146%
Revenue7.98B507M1,573%
Total Cash2.73B445M613%
Total Debt2.79B50.7M5,501%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAF: Fundamental Ratings
FAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
70
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAFHIPO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HIPO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGIJX14.060.07
+0.50%
Goldman Sachs Global Infras R6
RNWGX108.44-0.06
-0.06%
American Funds New World R-6
PADEX25.76-0.02
-0.08%
Franklin Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R5
FEFRX34.93-0.10
-0.29%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund R6
NFEDX24.65-0.09
-0.36%
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp S

FAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAF has been closely correlated with FNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAF jumps, then FNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FAF
1D Price
Change %
FAF100%
-0.27%
FNF - FAF
80%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
NMIH - FAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
ESNT - FAF
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
AIZ - FAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
ACT - FAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More