EIPAF
Price
$18.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
53.52B
GLPEF
Price
$18.57
Change
-$0.81 (-4.18%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
14.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EIPAF vs GLPEF

Header iconEIPAF vs GLPEF Comparison
Open Charts EIPAF vs GLPEFBanner chart's image
ENI S.p.A
Price$18.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.32K
Capitalization53.52B
Galp Energia, SA
Price$18.57
Change-$0.81 (-4.18%)
Volume$476
Capitalization14.25B
EIPAF vs GLPEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EIPAF vs. GLPEF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EIPAF is a Buy and GLPEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (EIPAF: $18.46 vs. GLPEF: $18.57)
Brand notoriety: EIPAF and GLPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EIPAF: 251% vs. GLPEF: 50%
Market capitalization -- EIPAF: $53.52B vs. GLPEF: $14.25B
EIPAF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $53.52B. GLPEF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $14.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $492.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $57.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EIPAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLPEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EIPAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLPEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLPEF is a better buy in the long-term than EIPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EIPAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLPEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EIPAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLPEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the short-term than GLPEF.

Price Growth

EIPAF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GLPEF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -4.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-0.47% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIPAF($53.5B) has a higher market cap than GLPEF($14.2B). EIPAF has higher P/E ratio than GLPEF: EIPAF (21.12) vs GLPEF (11.22). EIPAF YTD gains are higher at: 40.274 vs. GLPEF (6.703). EIPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.3B vs. GLPEF (3.1B). EIPAF has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. GLPEF (2.77B). GLPEF has less debt than EIPAF: GLPEF (4.95B) vs EIPAF (34.9B). EIPAF has higher revenues than GLPEF: EIPAF (85.5B) vs GLPEF (20.3B).
EIPAFGLPEFEIPAF / GLPEF
Capitalization53.5B14.2B377%
EBITDA24.3B3.1B783%
Gain YTD40.2746.703601%
P/E Ratio21.1211.22188%
Revenue85.5B20.3B421%
Total Cash16B2.77B578%
Total Debt34.9B4.95B706%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EIPAF vs GLPEF: Fundamental Ratings
EIPAF
GLPEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3235
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3050
SMR RATING
1..100
8642
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
925
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EIPAF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPEF (32). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPEF (50). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

GLPEF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EIPAF (86). This means that GLPEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPEF (54). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as GLPEF (25). This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLPEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EIPAFGLPEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLPEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CGRO31.570.37
+1.18%
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Gr ETF
KBWB78.450.15
+0.19%
Invesco KBW Bank ETF
PHEQ31.90-0.02
-0.05%
Parametric Hedged Equity ETF
EZA61.67-0.30
-0.48%
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
MQQQ176.16-1.58
-0.89%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation 100 Monthly ETF

EIPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIPAF and GLPEF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIPAF and GLPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIPAF
1D Price
Change %
EIPAF100%
N/A
GLPEF - EIPAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPAQF - EIPAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
NFG - EIPAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
SLNG - EIPAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
TGS - EIPAF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
More

GLPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLPEF and E have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLPEF and E's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLPEF
1D Price
Change %
GLPEF100%
N/A
E - GLPEF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
NFG - GLPEF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
EC - GLPEF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
EQNR - GLPEF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
EIPAF - GLPEF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More