Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKBAX vs RGQFX
EKBAX vs RGQFX Comparison
Open Charts EKBAX vs RGQFX
EKBAX vs RGQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKBAX vs. RGQFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKBAX is a Buy and RGQFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGQFX has more cash in the bank: 23B vs. EKBAX (2.48B). RGQFX pays higher dividends than EKBAX: RGQFX (1.67) vs EKBAX (0.47). EKBAX was incepted earlier than RGQFX: EKBAX (28 years) vs RGQFX (11 years). EKBAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than RGQFX (0.48). EKBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RGQFX (2.00). RGQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKBAX: RGQFX (250) vs EKBAX (1000). EKBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.20 vs. RGQFX (17.78). EKBAX return over 5 years is better than : 65.82 vs. RGQFX (33.15).
| EKBAX | RGQFX | EKBAX / RGQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.48 | 225% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.48 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.523 | 8.985 | 362% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 23B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.67 | 28% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.20 | 17.78 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.75 | 51.81 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.82 | 33.15 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.58 | 89.89 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers