Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$12.25
Change-$0.13 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. EKJAX (1.44B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJAX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJAX (0.00). EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGACX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. EKJAX (-3.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. EKJAX (-30.33).
| EKJAX | RGACX | EKJAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.94 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.94 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.377 | 14.863 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.58 | 6.60 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.27 | 60.28 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.33 | 30.90 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.58 | 84.84 | -27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement