Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A
Price$12.84
Change-$0.06 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. EKJAX (1.51B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJAX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJAX (0.00). EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). EKJAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGACX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.15 vs. EKJAX (6.73). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.12 vs. EKJAX (-22.79).
| EKJAX | RGACX | EKJAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.94 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.94 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.665 | 18.822 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.73 | 15.15 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.48 | 66.19 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.79 | 45.12 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.19 | 103.64 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement