Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. EKJAX (1.23B). EKJAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJAX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EKJAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGACX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.54 vs. EKJAX (-27.57). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 8.61 vs. EKJAX (-53.55).
| EKJAX | RGACX | EKJAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.93 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.93 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.274 | 7.205 | -18% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.23B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.57 | -2.54 | 1,087% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.76 | 39.57 | -30% |
| Returns for 5 years | -53.55 | 8.61 | -622% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.64 | 96.54 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement