Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGACX
EKJAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. EKJAX (1.27B). EKJAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJAX (29 years) vs RGACX (24 years). EKJAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGACX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.93 vs. EKJAX (-23.82). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 10.91 vs. EKJAX (-51.24).
| EKJAX | RGACX | EKJAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.93 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.93 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.212 | 5.397 | -4% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.82 | 0.93 | -2,569% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.16 | 33.65 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.24 | 10.91 | -470% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.75 | 94.42 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement