Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJAX vs RGAGX
EKJAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKJAX vs RGAGX
EKJAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJAX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. EKJAX (1.34B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than EKJAX: RGAGX (0.51) vs EKJAX (0.00). EKJAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: EKJAX (28 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). EKJAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). EKJAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKJAX: RGAGX (250) vs EKJAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. EKJAX (-16.40). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.74 vs. EKJAX (-47.62).
| EKJAX | RGAGX | EKJAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.29 | 372% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.29 | 393% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.989 | 7.335 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.40 | 4.75 | -345% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.88 | 41.00 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -47.62 | 17.74 | -268% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.41 | 106.44 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement