Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs GFACX
EKJFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs GFACX
EKJFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. EKJFX (1.24B). EKJFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: EKJFX (14 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: EKJFX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. EKJFX (-22.26). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. EKJFX (-43.43).
| EKJFX | GFACX | EKJFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.35 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.35 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.407 | 8.529 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.26 | -2.39 | 931% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.00 | 34.46 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.43 | 3.85 | -1,127% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.76 | 82.33 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement