Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr R6
Price$15.03
Change-$0.17 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.69
Change-$0.58 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. EKJFX (1.44B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJFX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJFX (0.00). EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJFX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: EKJFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. EKJFX (-0.13). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.90 vs. EKJFX (-20.63).
| EKJFX | RGACX | EKJFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.94 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.765 | 14.863 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.44B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.13 | 6.60 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.47 | 60.28 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.63 | 30.90 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.98 | 84.84 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement