Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr R6
Price$15.31
Change+$0.12 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.04
Change+$0.52 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. EKJFX (1.46B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJFX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJFX (0.00). EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJFX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: EKJFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.23 vs. EKJFX (10.31). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.74 vs. EKJFX (-18.33).
| EKJFX | RGACX | EKJFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.94 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.689 | 15.349 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.46B | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 15.23 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.94 | 53.12 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.33 | 35.74 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.25 | 95.87 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement