Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGACX
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr R6
Price$15.47
Change-$0.13 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.04
Change-$0.80 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. EKJFX (1.5B). RGACX pays higher dividends than EKJFX: RGACX (0.07) vs EKJFX (0.00). EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJFX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: EKJFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. EKJFX (8.18). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.08 vs. EKJFX (-11.21).
| EKJFX | RGACX | EKJFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.94 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.812 | 16.738 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 12.33 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.54 | 71.09 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.21 | 45.08 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.69 | 110.29 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement