Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. EKJFX (1.34B). EKJFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJFX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: EKJFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.68 vs. EKJFX (-10.96). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.46 vs. EKJFX (-37.25).
| EKJFX | RGACX | EKJFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.93 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.297 | 6.959 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.96 | 3.68 | -298% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.17 | 37.13 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.25 | 13.46 | -277% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.76 | 97.58 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement