Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts EKJFX vs RGACX
EKJFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKJFX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKJFX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. EKJFX (1.27B). EKJFX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . EKJFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: EKJFX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than EKJFX (0.73). EKJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). EKJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: EKJFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. EKJFX (-16.31). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. EKJFX (-40.70).
| EKJFX | RGACX | EKJFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.93 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.630 | 9.193 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.31 | 4.90 | -333% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.70 | 44.95 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.70 | 14.75 | -276% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.39 | 96.44 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers