Ad is loading...
EKSCX vs HBLAX
EKSCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts EKSCX vs HBLAX
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr C
Price$6.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets339.78M
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.1B
EKSCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSCX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. EKSCX (340M). EKSCX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: EKSCX (3.84) vs HBLAX (3.35). EKSCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: EKSCX (32 years) vs HBLAX (18 years). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. EKSCX (45.00). EKSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: EKSCX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to EKSCX: HBLAX (2000) vs EKSCX (250). EKSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. HBLAX (5.97). EKSCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.63 vs. HBLAX (8.26).
| EKSCX | HBLAX | EKSCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.825 | 1.340 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 340M | 12.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.84 | 3.35 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 5.97 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.40 | 0.35 | 2,112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.63 | 8.26 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.61 | 33.45 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...