Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSCX vs HBLAX
EKSCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts EKSCX vs HBLAX
EKSCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSCX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. EKSCX (560M). EKSCX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: EKSCX (4.04) vs HBLAX (3.15). EKSCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: EKSCX (34 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). EKSCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EKSCX (83.00). EKSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: EKSCX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to EKSCX: HBLAX (2000) vs EKSCX (250). EKSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.98 vs. HBLAX (4.92). EKSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.31 vs. HBLAX (6.14).
| EKSCX | HBLAX | EKSCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.89 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.89 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.248 | 5.964 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 560M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.04 | 3.15 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.98 | 4.92 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 23.09 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.31 | 6.14 | 494% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.78 | 39.11 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement