Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSCX vs HBLAX
EKSCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts EKSCX vs HBLAX
EKSCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSCX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. EKSCX (546M). EKSCX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: EKSCX (3.97) vs HBLAX (3.19). EKSCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: EKSCX (33 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). EKSCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EKSCX (83.00). EKSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: EKSCX (1000) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to EKSCX: HBLAX (2000) vs EKSCX (250). EKSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.08 vs. HBLAX (6.67). EKSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.06 vs. HBLAX (5.54).
| EKSCX | HBLAX | EKSCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.89 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.89 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.418 | 3.324 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 546M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 3.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.08 | 6.67 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.78 | 20.39 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.06 | 5.54 | 543% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.69 | 41.10 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement