Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSCX vs HBLSX
EKSCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts EKSCX vs HBLSX
EKSCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. EKSCX (546M). EKSCX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: EKSCX (3.97) vs HBLSX (3.08). EKSCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: EKSCX (33 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). EKSCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EKSCX (83.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKSCX: HBLSX (0) vs EKSCX (1000). EKSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.08 vs. HBLSX (6.60). EKSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.06 vs. HBLSX (5.17).
| EKSCX | HBLSX | EKSCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.96 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.96 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.418 | 3.264 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 546M | 11.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.97 | 3.08 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.08 | 6.60 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.78 | 20.11 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.06 | 5.17 | 581% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.69 | 40.46 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement