Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSCX vs HBLSX
EKSCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts EKSCX vs HBLSX
EKSCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. EKSCX (560M). EKSCX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: EKSCX (4.04) vs HBLSX (3.04). EKSCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: EKSCX (34 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). EKSCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EKSCX (83.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKSCX: HBLSX (0) vs EKSCX (1000). EKSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.98 vs. HBLSX (4.85). EKSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.31 vs. HBLSX (5.83).
| EKSCX | HBLSX | EKSCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.96 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.96 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.248 | 5.860 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 560M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.04 | 3.04 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.98 | 4.85 | 267% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 22.86 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.31 | 5.83 | 520% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.78 | 38.43 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement