Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSCX vs HBLSX
EKSCX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts EKSCX vs HBLSX
EKSCX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSCX vs. HBLSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSCX is a Buy and HBLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. EKSCX (549M). EKSCX pays higher dividends than HBLSX: EKSCX (3.88) vs HBLSX (3.07). EKSCX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: EKSCX (33 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). EKSCX (1.85) is less costly to investors than HBLSX (0.96). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EKSCX (83.00). HBLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKSCX: HBLSX (0) vs EKSCX (1000). EKSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.84 vs. HBLSX (4.95). EKSCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.91 vs. HBLSX (5.80).
| EKSCX | HBLSX | EKSCX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.96 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.85 | 0.96 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.540 | 4.264 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 549M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.88 | 3.07 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.84 | 4.95 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.02 | 18.51 | 216% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.91 | 5.80 | 481% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.90 | 37.42 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement