Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSRX vs HBLCX
EKSRX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts EKSRX vs HBLCX
EKSRX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSRX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSRX is a Buy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. EKSRX (549M). EKSRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: EKSRX (5.19) vs HBLCX (2.47). EKSRX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: EKSRX (8 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than EKSRX (0.69). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EKSRX (83.00). EKSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: EKSRX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). EKSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.99 vs. HBLCX (4.05). EKSRX return over 5 years is better than : 35.31 vs. HBLCX (1.87).
| EKSRX | HBLCX | EKSRX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.65 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.204 | 3.951 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 549M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.19 | 2.47 | 210% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.99 | 4.05 | 345% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.95 | 15.85 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.31 | 1.87 | 1,891% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement