Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKSRX vs HBLCX
EKSRX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts EKSRX vs HBLCX
EKSRX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKSRX vs. HBLCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKSRX is a Buy and HBLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. EKSRX (560M). EKSRX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: EKSRX (5.38) vs HBLCX (2.45). EKSRX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: EKSRX (8 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than EKSRX (0.69). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. EKSRX (83.00). EKSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: EKSRX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). EKSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.32 vs. HBLCX (3.96). EKSRX return over 5 years is better than : 37.94 vs. HBLCX (1.89).
| EKSRX | HBLCX | EKSRX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.65 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.65 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.102 | 5.443 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 560M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.38 | 2.45 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.32 | 3.96 | 361% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.20 | 20.05 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.94 | 1.89 | 2,013% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement