Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FGADX
EKWAX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FGADX
EKWAX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FGADX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 2.81B vs. EKWAX (1.12B). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FGADX (9.06) vs EKWAX (1.14). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FGADX (29 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.76 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FGADX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.87 vs. EKWAX (44.06). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 142.06 vs. FGADX (121.02).
| EKWAX | FGADX | EKWAX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.486 | -12.151 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 2.81B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 9.06 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.06 | 54.87 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 171.90 | 205.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 142.06 | 121.02 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.53 | 250.65 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement