Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FGADX
EKWAX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FGADX
EKWAX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FGADX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 2.8B vs. EKWAX (1.09B). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FGADX (10.90) vs EKWAX (1.33). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FGADX (30 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.76 vs. EKWAX (14.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FGADX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.93 vs. EKWAX (46.78). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 173.94 vs. FGADX (145.91).
| EKWAX | FGADX | EKWAX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.62 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.422 | -11.369 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 2.8B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 10.90 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.78 | 60.93 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 186.89 | 216.64 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 173.94 | 145.91 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 184.34 | 195.73 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement