Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FGADX
EKWAX vs FGADX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FGADX
EKWAX vs FGADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FGADX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FGADX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.38B vs. EKWAX (1.32B). FGADX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FGADX (8.48) vs EKWAX (1.03). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FGADX: EKWAX (29 years) vs FGADX (30 years). EKWAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). FGADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.76 vs. EKWAX (8.00). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWAX: FGADX (0) vs EKWAX (1000). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.34 vs. EKWAX (45.45). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 285.51 vs. FGADX (246.74).
| EKWAX | FGADX | EKWAX / FGADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.62 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.621 | 13.440 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 3.38B | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 8.48 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.45 | 55.34 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 281.64 | 324.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 285.51 | 246.74 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 324.27 | 327.81 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers