Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWAX vs FKRCX
EKWAX vs FKRCX Comparison
Open Charts EKWAX vs FKRCX
EKWAX vs FKRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWAX vs. FKRCX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWAX is a Hold and FKRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKRCX has more cash in the bank: 2.81B vs. EKWAX (1.12B). FKRCX pays higher dividends than EKWAX: FKRCX (9.93) vs EKWAX (1.14). EKWAX was incepted earlier than FKRCX: EKWAX (28 years) vs FKRCX (57 years). EKWAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FKRCX (0.87). FKRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.76 vs. EKWAX (14.00). EKWAX (6%) and FKRCX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. EKWAX (1000) and FKRCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FKRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 54.48 vs. EKWAX (44.06). EKWAX return over 5 years is better than : 142.06 vs. FKRCX (118.33).
| EKWAX | FKRCX | EKWAX / FKRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.87 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.87 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 57 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.486 | -12.245 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 2.81B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 9.93 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.06 | 54.48 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 171.90 | 202.85 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 142.06 | 118.33 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.53 | 242.69 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement