Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGIX
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$84.54
Change-$0.41 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.64M
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGIX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWCX (756M). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGIX (3.67) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGIX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.78 vs. FEGIX (49.80). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. FEGIX (57.48).
| EKWCX | FEGIX | EKWCX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.93 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.93 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 73.722 | 56.450 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.67 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.78 | 49.80 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 142.46 | 105.62 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.73 | 57.48 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.71 | 253.76 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers