Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGIX
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$79.14
Change-$0.93 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.74M
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGIX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. EKWCX (693M). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGIX (3.62) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGIX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.96 vs. FEGIX (44.35). FEGIX return over 5 years is better than : 52.66 vs. EKWCX (48.27).
| EKWCX | FEGIX | EKWCX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.93 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.93 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 63.742 | 51.450 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 3.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.62 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.96 | 44.35 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 143.23 | 107.59 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.27 | 52.66 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 286.15 | 262.04 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement