Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGIX
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGIX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$97.07
Change+$2.34 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets881.62M
EKWCX vs FEGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGIX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGIX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. EKWCX (882M). FEGIX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGIX (3.14) vs EKWCX (0.05). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGIX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGIX (22 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FEGIX (0.93). FEGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGIX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGIX (1000000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 92.70 vs. FEGIX (67.83). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 84.66 vs. FEGIX (75.25).
| EKWCX | FEGIX | EKWCX / FEGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.93 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.93 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 98.507 | 76.756 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 882M | 4.33B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 3.14 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 92.70 | 67.83 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 210.61 | 153.28 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.66 | 75.25 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 375.41 | 329.02 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement