Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$58.42
Change-$1.61 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.96M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 2.94B vs. EKWCX (441M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (0.22) vs EKWCX (0.00). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.39 vs. EKWCX (9.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.98 vs. FEGOX (52.66). FEGOX return over 5 years is better than : 50.80 vs. EKWCX (46.64).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.468 | 19.167 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 2.94B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 67.98 | 52.66 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 31.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.64 | 50.80 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.13 | 98.16 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...