Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$110.30
Change-$2.02 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 5.01B vs. EKWCX (1.13B). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (2.58) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.92) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 112.68 vs. FEGOX (81.27). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 121.22 vs. FEGOX (96.27).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 129.693 | 99.079 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 5.01B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 112.68 | 81.27 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 246.24 | 169.17 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.22 | 96.27 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 371.74 | 288.41 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement