Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$111.50
Change+$1.29 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 4.76B vs. EKWCX (1.1B). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (2.71) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (23 years). EKWCX (1.92) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 114.20 vs. FEGOX (85.38). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 138.15 vs. FEGOX (107.34).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 125.378 | 97.061 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 4.76B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.71 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 114.20 | 85.38 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 207.79 | 144.85 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 138.15 | 107.34 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 444.52 | 340.46 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement