Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$97.07
Change+$2.34 (+2.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets903.58M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 4.42B vs. EKWCX (904M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.01) vs EKWCX (0.05). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.92) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 92.70 vs. FEGOX (66.21). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 84.66 vs. FEGOX (67.21).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 98.507 | 75.570 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 904M | 4.42B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 3.01 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 92.70 | 66.21 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 210.61 | 146.00 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.66 | 67.21 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 375.41 | 288.46 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement