Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$67.65
Change+$3.04 (+4.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.88M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. EKWCX (523M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.84) vs EKWCX (0.07). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.12 vs. FEGOX (32.49). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 71.62 vs. FEGOX (63.19).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.91 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.127 | 28.684 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 3.22B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 3.84 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.12 | 32.49 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.73 | 27.50 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.62 | 63.19 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | 126.82 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...