Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$74.60
Change+$0.56 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets608.62M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FEGOX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.56B vs. EKWCX (609M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.53) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.03 vs. FEGOX (42.09). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.66 vs. FEGOX (59.92).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.91 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 51.411 | 42.895 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 609M | 3.56B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.53 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.03 | 42.09 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.09 | 63.45 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.66 | 59.92 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.08 | 145.76 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers