Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FEGOX
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FEGOX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$84.54
Change-$0.41 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.64M
EKWCX vs FEGOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FEGOX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FEGOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEGOX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWCX (756M). FEGOX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FEGOX (3.51) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FEGOX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FEGOX (22 years). EKWCX (1.94) and FEGOX (1.91) have similar cost to investors . FEGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FEGOX: EKWCX (1000) vs FEGOX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.78 vs. FEGOX (48.31). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. FEGOX (50.27).
| EKWCX | FEGOX | EKWCX / FEGOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.91 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.91 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 73.722 | 55.482 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.51 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.78 | 48.31 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 142.46 | 99.61 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.73 | 50.27 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.71 | 219.93 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers