Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$54.06
Change+$0.54 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$27.91
Change+$0.21 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. EKWCX (374M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (0.97) vs EKWCX (0.00). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWCX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.13 vs. FSAGX (34.46). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.77 vs. FSAGX (37.29).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.702 | 25.227 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 1.6B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.13 | 34.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.42 | 5.69 | 394% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.77 | 37.29 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.31 | 70.76 | 116% |