Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$49.45
Change+$0.06 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$24.88
Change+$0.07 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. EKWCX (342M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (0.97) vs EKWCX (0.00). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWCX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.21 vs. FSAGX (14.41). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.42 vs. FSAGX (15.87).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.701 | 16.373 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 342M | 1.44B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.21 | 14.41 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.63 | 2.51 | 823% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.42 | 15.87 | 192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.27 | 71.63 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...