Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$58.42
Change-$1.61 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.96M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$29.39
Change-$0.83 (-2.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.46B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. EKWCX (441M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (0.97) vs EKWCX (0.00). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWCX (9.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 67.98 vs. FSAGX (61.35). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.64 vs. FSAGX (26.20).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.468 | 19.569 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 441M | 1.46B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 67.98 | 61.35 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 15.08 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.64 | 26.20 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.13 | 84.30 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...