Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$78.53
Change+$1.12 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.84M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$38.67
Change+$0.58 (+1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. EKWCX (651M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (2.29) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 74.90 vs. FSAGX (66.35). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 67.38 vs. FSAGX (44.44).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.68 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.68 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 58.303 | 54.963 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 651M | 2.24B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 2.29 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 74.90 | 66.35 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.90 | 73.19 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 44.44 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.47 | 161.14 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement