Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$67.65
Change+$3.04 (+4.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.88M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$33.91
Change+$1.56 (+4.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. EKWCX (523M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (2.71) vs EKWCX (0.07). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EKWCX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.12 vs. FSAGX (40.30). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 71.62 vs. FSAGX (50.34).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.70 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.70 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.127 | 31.611 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 1.93B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 2.71 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.12 | 40.30 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.73 | 10.70 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.62 | 50.34 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | 113.91 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers