Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$74.60
Change+$0.56 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets608.62M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$36.96
Change+$0.25 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. EKWCX (609M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (2.29) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (27 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWCX (11.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.03 vs. FSAGX (50.42). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.66 vs. FSAGX (42.32).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.68 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.68 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 51.411 | 49.349 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 609M | 2.24B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 2.29 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 60.03 | 50.42 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.09 | 54.30 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.66 | 42.32 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.08 | 133.61 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement