Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$84.54
Change-$0.41 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.64M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$41.60
Change-$0.31 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.33B vs. EKWCX (756M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (2.25) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.78 vs. FSAGX (64.43). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. FSAGX (39.42).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.68 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.68 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 73.722 | 70.504 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 2.33B | 32% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 2.25 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.78 | 64.43 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 142.46 | 108.90 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.73 | 39.42 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.71 | 222.36 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement