Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$79.14
Change-$0.93 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.74M
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$39.79
Change-$0.41 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.36B vs. EKWCX (693M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (2.21) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.96 vs. FSAGX (58.20). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.27 vs. FSAGX (29.61).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.68 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.68 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 63.742 | 63.548 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 2.36B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 2.21 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.96 | 58.20 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 143.23 | 114.92 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.27 | 29.61 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 286.15 | 236.81 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers