Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs FSAGX
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs FSAGX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$110.30
Change-$2.02 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$53.55
Change-$0.95 (-1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.61B
EKWCX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. FSAGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 3.61B vs. EKWCX (1.13B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: FSAGX (1.60) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: EKWCX (28 years) vs FSAGX (40 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. EKWCX (14.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than EKWCX: FSAGX (0) vs EKWCX (1000). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 112.68 vs. FSAGX (102.61). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 121.22 vs. FSAGX (87.49).
| EKWCX | FSAGX | EKWCX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 0.68 | 271% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.68 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 129.693 | 121.725 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 3.61B | 31% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 1.60 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 112.68 | 102.61 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 246.24 | 199.97 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 121.22 | 87.49 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 371.74 | 291.68 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement