Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$112.32
Change+$2.35 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and SGGDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 4.94B vs. EKWCX (1.1B). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (2.67) vs EKWCX (0.04). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (28 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 105.86 vs. SGGDX (82.93). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 120.22 vs. SGGDX (107.42).
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 1.16 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 124.888 | 102.569 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 4.94B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 2.67 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 105.86 | 82.93 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 239.00 | 178.43 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 120.22 | 107.42 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 361.87 | 323.27 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement