Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$79.14
Change-$0.93 (-1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.74M
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Jul 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Buy and SGGDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. EKWCX (693M). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (3.58) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (28 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.96 vs. SGGDX (44.00). SGGDX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. EKWCX (48.27).
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.16 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 63.742 | 51.265 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 3.8B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.96 | 44.00 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 143.23 | 106.11 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.27 | 50.92 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 286.15 | 253.18 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement