Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$84.54
Change-$0.41 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.64M
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a Hold and SGGDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 3.94B vs. EKWCX (756M). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (3.64) vs EKWCX (0.06). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (28 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (14.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 70.78 vs. SGGDX (49.40). EKWCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.73 vs. SGGDX (55.62).
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.16 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 73.722 | 56.206 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 756M | 3.94B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 3.64 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 70.78 | 49.40 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 142.46 | 104.12 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.73 | 55.62 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 277.71 | 244.91 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement