Ad is loading...
EKWCX vs SGGDX
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison
Open Charts EKWCX vs SGGDX
Allspring Precious Metals C
Price$67.65
Change+$3.04 (+4.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.88M
EKWCX vs SGGDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EKWCX vs. SGGDX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EKWCX is a StrongBuy and SGGDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SGGDX has more cash in the bank: 3.22B vs. EKWCX (523M). SGGDX pays higher dividends than EKWCX: SGGDX (4.00) vs EKWCX (0.07). EKWCX was incepted earlier than SGGDX: EKWCX (27 years) vs SGGDX (32 years). EKWCX (1.94) is less costly to investors than SGGDX (1.16). SGGDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.97 vs. EKWCX (11.00). EKWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SGGDX: EKWCX (1000) vs SGGDX (2500). EKWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.12 vs. SGGDX (33.51). EKWCX (71.62) and SGGDX (69.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EKWCX | SGGDX | EKWCX / SGGDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.84 | 1.16 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.16 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.127 | 28.972 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 523M | 3.22B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 4.00 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 48.12 | 33.51 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.73 | 30.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.62 | 69.03 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.47 | 144.38 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...