Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELCIX vs RGACX
ELCIX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ELCIX vs RGACX
ELCIX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ELCIX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELCIX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. ELCIX (462M). ELCIX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . ELCIX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ELCIX (19 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than ELCIX (0.79). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ELCIX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ELCIX: RGACX (250) vs ELCIX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. ELCIX (6.95). RGACX (20.00) and ELCIX (19.48) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ELCIX | RGACX | ELCIX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.93 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.93 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.928 | 9.232 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.95 | 12.26 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.12 | 49.99 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.48 | 20.00 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.77 | 104.41 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement