Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELCRX vs RGACX
ELCRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ELCRX vs RGACX
ELCRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ELCRX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELCRX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. ELCRX (462M). ELCRX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . ELCRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ELCRX (17 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ELCRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ELCRX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ELCRX: RGACX (250) vs ELCRX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. ELCRX (6.75). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.76 vs. ELCRX (13.59).
| ELCRX | RGACX | ELCRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.93 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.93 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.086 | 9.929 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 462M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.75 | 13.40 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.39 | 50.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.59 | 20.76 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.30 | 107.11 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement