Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELMCX vs RNWHX
ELMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ELMCX vs RNWHX
ELMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ELMCX (18.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ELMCX: RNWHX (1.15) vs ELMCX (0.27). ELMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ELMCX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). ELMCX (6.33) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ELMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ELMCX: RNWHX (250) vs ELMCX (1500). ELMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.62 vs. RNWHX (22.70).
| ELMCX | RNWHX | ELMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.72 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.33 | 0.72 | 879% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.074 | 12.401 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.4M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.27 | 1.15 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.62 | 22.70 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.15 | 49.65 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 13.71 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement