Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ELMFX vs RNWHX
ELMFX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ELMFX vs RNWHX
ELMFX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ELMFX (20.2M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ELMFX: RNWHX (1.15) vs ELMFX (0.86). ELMFX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ELMFX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). ELMFX (5.43) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ELMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). ELMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: ELMFX (0) vs RNWHX (250). ELMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.78 vs. RNWHX (31.15).
| ELMFX | RNWHX | ELMFX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.72 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.43 | 0.72 | 754% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.214 | 18.743 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.2M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.15 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.78 | 31.15 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 112.12 | 57.37 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.21 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 132.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement