Advertisement
ELVR vs SGML
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ELVR is a Hold and SGML is a Hold.
| ELVR | SGML | ELVR / SGML | |
| Capitalization | 997M | 1.07B | 93% |
| EBITDA | 75.4M | 25.4M | 297% |
| Gain YTD | -3.329 | -27.976 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.92 | 120.72 | 16% |
| Revenue | 202M | 142M | 142% |
| Total Cash | 255M | 16.7M | 1,527% |
| Total Debt | 77.6M | 268M | 29% |
SGML | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ELVR | SGML | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 19 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ELVR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SGML’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ELVR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SGML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ELVR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGML’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ELVR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SGML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ELVR (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.59% price change this week, while SGML (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -23.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -5.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
SGML is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-5.70% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
Advertisement
ELVR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELVR has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ELVR jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELVR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELVR | 100% | -4.90% | ||
| LAR - ELVR | 40% Loosely correlated | -8.74% | ||
| SGML - ELVR | 35% Loosely correlated | -5.66% | ||
| LZM - ELVR | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| NMG - ELVR | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SKE - ELVR | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||
SGML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGML has been loosely correlated with LAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGML jumps, then LAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGML | 100% | -5.66% | ||
| LAR - SGML | 59% Loosely correlated | -8.74% | ||
| ATLX - SGML | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| RIO - SGML | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| NB - SGML | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| BHP - SGML | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||