Advertisement
EM vs PFSMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EM is a Hold and PFSMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFSMF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PFSMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -2.86% price change this week, while PFSMF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -7.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +340.05%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.27%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (-7.40% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
@Hospital/Nursing Management (-3.11% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| EM | PFSMF | EM / PFSMF | |
| Capitalization | 345M | 221M | 156% |
| EBITDA | 101M | 542M | 19% |
| Gain YTD | 88.889 | -21.562 | -412% |
| P/E Ratio | 64.39 | 11.31 | 569% |
| Revenue | 1.96B | 1.3B | 151% |
| Total Cash | 3.04B | 471M | 645% |
| Total Debt | 10.6M | 239M | 4% |
| EM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSJT | 21.40 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2029 HY Corp Bd ETF | |||
| LAPR | 25.16 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Premium Inc 15 Bffr ETF - Aprl | |||
| NOVP | 29.67 | -0.03 | -0.10% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Nov | |||
| PFXF | 17.24 | -0.10 | -0.58% |
| VanEck Pref Secs ex Fincls ETF | |||
| TSLZ | 15.57 | -0.22 | -1.39% |
| T-REX 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | |||
EM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EM and TCOM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EM and TCOM's prices will move in lockstep.
PFSMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PFSMF and NTRP have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFSMF and NTRP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFSMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTRP - PFSMF | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
| EM - PFSMF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EJH - PFSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
| SDRMF - PFSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| TRPCF - PFSMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||