EM vs PFSMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EM is a Hold and PFSMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFSMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PFSMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EM (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PFSMF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.85%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (+2.37% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| EM | PFSMF | EM / PFSMF | |
| Capitalization | 162M | 701M | 23% |
| EBITDA | -262M | 537M | -49% |
| Gain YTD | 47.786 | -30.872 | -155% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.48 | 13.64 | 84% |
| Revenue | 3.27B | 1.22B | 269% |
| Total Cash | 3.13B | 626M | 500% |
| Total Debt | 16.8M | 242M | 7% |
| EM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RPBAX | 28.14 | 0.08 | +0.29% |
| T. Rowe Price Balanced | |||
| HLFMX | 8.12 | 0.01 | +0.12% |
| Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inst | |||
| MSCLX | 19.57 | N/A | N/A |
| MassMutual Small Cap Opps Adm | |||
| EMRGX | 6.93 | -0.02 | -0.29% |
| Emerging Markets Growth Fund M | |||
| EEMPX | 8.05 | -0.04 | -0.49% |
| MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research A | |||
EM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EM and TCOM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EM and TCOM's prices will move in lockstep.
PFSMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PFSMF and NTRP have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFSMF and NTRP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFSMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFSMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTRP - PFSMF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| EM - PFSMF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| EJH - PFSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| SDRMF - PFSMF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRPCF - PFSMF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||