EM
Price
$1.35
Change
-$0.03 (-2.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
349.97M
TRPCF
Price
$72.22
Change
+$7.51 (+11.61%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
47.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EM vs TRPCF

Header iconEM vs TRPCF Comparison
Open Charts EM vs TRPCFBanner chart's image
Smart Share Global
Price$1.35
Change-$0.03 (-2.17%)
Volume$340.95K
Capitalization349.97M
Trip.com Group
Price$72.22
Change+$7.51 (+11.61%)
Volume$179
Capitalization47.92B
EM vs TRPCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EM vs. TRPCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EM is a StrongBuy and TRPCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EM: $1.35 vs. TRPCF: $72.22)
Brand notoriety: EM and TRPCF are both not notable
EM represents the Personnel Services, while TRPCF is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EM: 35% vs. TRPCF: 49%
Market capitalization -- EM: $349.97M vs. TRPCF: $47.92B
EM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $349.97M. TRPCF’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $47.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRPCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRPCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRPCF is a better buy in the long-term than EM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRPCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRPCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRPCF is a better buy in the short-term than EM.

Price Growth

EM (@Personnel Services) experienced а +2.27% price change this week, while TRPCF (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +216.67%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-6.56% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRPCF($47.9B) has a higher market cap than EM($350M). EM has higher P/E ratio than TRPCF: EM (64.39) vs TRPCF (19.92). EM YTD gains are higher at: 87.500 vs. TRPCF (35.828). TRPCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.4B vs. EM (101M). TRPCF has more cash in the bank: 78.1B vs. EM (3.04B). EM has less debt than TRPCF: EM (10.6M) vs TRPCF (42.8B). TRPCF has higher revenues than EM: TRPCF (55.2B) vs EM (1.96B).
EMTRPCFEM / TRPCF
Capitalization350M47.9B1%
EBITDA101M19.4B1%
Gain YTD87.50035.828244%
P/E Ratio64.3919.92323%
Revenue1.96B55.2B4%
Total Cash3.04B78.1B4%
Total Debt10.6M42.8B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMTRPCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRPCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTTZF0.250.02
+7.83%
Centaurus Metals Ltd.
PROSY12.240.04
+0.33%
Prosus NV
LMPMF0.28N/A
N/A
Lee & Man Paper Manufacturing Ltd.
MGPUF3.70N/A
N/A
M&G PLC
RSCI0.07N/A
N/A
Redwood Scientific Technologies, Inc.

TRPCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRPCF and ROL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRPCF and ROL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRPCF
1D Price
Change %
TRPCF100%
N/A
ROL - TRPCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
WW - TRPCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
ABNB - TRPCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
EM - TRPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
MRM - TRPCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.89%
More