Ad is loading...
EM
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
TRPCF
Price
$53.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

EM vs TRPCF

Header iconEM vs TRPCF Comparison
Open Charts EM vs TRPCFBanner chart's image
Smart Share Global
Price$0.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$47.77K
CapitalizationN/A
Trip.com Group
Price$53.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.98K
CapitalizationN/A
EM vs TRPCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EM vs. TRPCF commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EM is a Hold and TRPCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (EM: $0.69 vs. TRPCF: $53.40)
Brand notoriety: EM and TRPCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EM: 42% vs. TRPCF: 49%
Market capitalization -- EM: $161.66M vs. TRPCF: $26.35B
EM [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $161.66M. TRPCF’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $26.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRPCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRPCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EM and TRPCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

EM (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while TRPCF (@Other Consumer Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+2.50% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRPCF($26.4B) has a higher market cap than EM($162M). TRPCF has higher P/E ratio than EM: TRPCF (30.58) vs EM (11.48). TRPCF YTD gains are higher at: 58.305 vs. EM (40.910). TRPCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.96B vs. EM (-262M). TRPCF has more cash in the bank: 48B vs. EM (3.13B). EM has less debt than TRPCF: EM (16.8M) vs TRPCF (53.2B). TRPCF has higher revenues than EM: TRPCF (25.1B) vs EM (3.27B).
EMTRPCFEM / TRPCF
Capitalization162M26.4B1%
EBITDA-262M8.96B-3%
Gain YTD40.91058.30570%
P/E Ratio11.4830.5838%
Revenue3.27B25.1B13%
Total Cash3.13B48B7%
Total Debt16.8M53.2B0%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMPFX123.851.29
+1.05%
ClearBridge Growth FI
UEPIX15.500.08
+0.52%
ProFunds Europe 30 Inv
CAMIX26.18N/A
N/A
Cambiar International Equity Inv
EMRGX6.93N/A
N/A
Emerging Markets Growth Fund M
ARILX14.69N/A
N/A
Aristotle Core Eq I

EM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EM and TCOM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EM and TCOM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EM
1D Price
Change %
EM100%
-4.65%
TCOM - EM
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
BFAM - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
CCL - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
LIND - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
SABR - EM
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More

TRPCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRPCF and ROL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRPCF and ROL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRPCF
1D Price
Change %
TRPCF100%
N/A
ROL - TRPCF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
WW - TRPCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
ABNB - TRPCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
EM - TRPCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-4.65%
MRM - TRPCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
More