EMBC
Price
$4.94
Change
+$0.05 (+1.02%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
279.9M
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WAT
Price
$408.34
Change
+$6.70 (+1.67%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
40.09B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMBC vs WAT

EMBC vs WAT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMBC vs. WAT commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMBC is a Hold and WAT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAT($40.1B) has a higher market cap than EMBC($280M). WAT has higher P/E ratio than EMBC: WAT (103.38) vs EMBC (3.36). WAT YTD gains are higher at: 7.506 vs. EMBC (-57.600). WAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 968M vs. EMBC (266M). WAT has more cash in the bank: 539M vs. EMBC (215M). EMBC has less debt than WAT: EMBC (1.49B) vs WAT (5.45B). WAT has higher revenues than EMBC: WAT (4.64B) vs EMBC (1.02B).
EMBCWATEMBC / WAT
Capitalization280M40.1B1%
EBITDA266M968M27%
Gain YTD-57.6007.506-767%
P/E Ratio3.36103.383%
Revenue1.02B4.64B22%
Total Cash215M539M40%
Total Debt1.49B5.45B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WAT: Fundamental Ratings
WAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMBCWAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (EMBC: $4.94 vs. WAT: $408.34)
Brand notoriety: EMBC and WAT are both not notable
EMBC represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other, while WAT is part of the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMBC: 60% vs. WAT: 64%
Market capitalization -- EMBC: $279.9M vs. WAT: $40.09B
EMBC [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $279.9M. WAT’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $40.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $126 to $130.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $27 to $3.82T. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $8.43B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $18.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while WAT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMBC is a better buy in the long-term than WAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WAT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WAT is a better buy in the short-term than EMBC.

Price Growth

EMBC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -14.83% price change this week, while WAT (@Medical Specialties) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.67%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +36.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMBC is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.

WAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-3.51% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Medical Specialties (-3.54% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

View a ticker or compare two or three
EMBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRNHX55.94N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price New Horizons
MASGX18.93N/A
N/A
Matthews Emerging Markets Sust Fut Inv
AMLPX11.77N/A
N/A
MainGate MLP A
JENYX44.04N/A
N/A
Jensen Quality Growth Y
FBBYX26.56N/A
N/A
Fundamental Family Office Allocation Y

EMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMBC has been loosely correlated with BLFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMBC jumps, then BLFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMBC
1D Price
Change %
EMBC100%
+1.02%
BLFS - EMBC
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
WAT - EMBC
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
MTD - EMBC
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
AVTR - EMBC
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
RVTY - EMBC
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.79%
More