Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMCAX vs NRGSX
EMCAX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts EMCAX vs NRGSX
EMCAX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMCAX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMCAX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.2B vs. EMCAX (26.1M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than EMCAX: NRGSX (0.44) vs EMCAX (0.00). EMCAX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: EMCAX (31 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). EMCAX (2.24) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. EMCAX (10.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMCAX: NRGSX (0) vs EMCAX (2500). EMCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. NRGSX (-5.21). EMCAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.12 vs. NRGSX (-21.35).
| EMCAX | NRGSX | EMCAX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.74 | 303% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.74 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.513 | 14.533 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1M | 7.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | -5.21 | -232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.33 | 5.52 | 767% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.12 | -21.35 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.20 | 13.24 | 1,142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers