Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$14.07
Change+$0.13 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.69M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.99B
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 73B vs. EMEAX (225M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMEAX: RNWHX (0.97) vs EMEAX (0.60). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.14 vs. RNWHX (16.76). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. EMEAX (16.44).
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.72 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.657 | 22.034 | 121% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 225M | 73B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.97 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.14 | 16.76 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.44 | 45.42 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.44 | 30.81 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement