Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity A
Price$12.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.56M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$85.04
Change+$0.19 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.63B
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 67.6B vs. EMEAX (178M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMEAX: RNWHX (1.04) vs EMEAX (0.39). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMEAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. RNWHX (7.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. EMEAX (15.23).
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.72 | 244% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.862 | 11.865 | 92% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 67.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.04 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 7.68 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.75 | 23.56 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.23 | 30.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement