Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. EMEAX (339M). RNWHX (1.15) and EMEAX (1.10) have matching dividends . EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMEAX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 62.28 vs. RNWHX (29.50). RNWHX (19.26) and EMEAX (19.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.72 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.014 | 16.719 | 185% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.15 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 62.28 | 29.50 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.20 | 56.33 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.16 | 19.26 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 197.07 | 121.12 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement