Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. EMEAX (387M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMEAX: RNWHX (1.15) vs EMEAX (1.08). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMEAX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.06 vs. RNWHX (17.19). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.68 vs. EMEAX (15.01).
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.72 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.589 | 16.447 | 162% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 90B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.06 | 17.19 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.24 | 53.84 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.01 | 17.68 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.52 | 111.44 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement