Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMEAX vs RNWHX
EMEAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMEAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMEAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EMEAX (354M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMEAX: RNWHX (1.14) vs EMEAX (1.04). EMEAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMEAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMEAX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMEAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMEAX (1000). EMEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.60 vs. RNWHX (19.47). EMEAX (14.10) and RNWHX (14.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| EMEAX | RNWHX | EMEAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.72 | 181% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.72 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.807 | 12.651 | 220% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.14 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.60 | 19.47 | 255% |
| Returns for 3 years | 81.90 | 43.67 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.10 | 14.04 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.22 | 107.31 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement