| EMES | IEMG | EMES / IEMG | |
| Gain YTD | 28.612 | 19.414 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 12.1M | 161B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.09 | 722% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 6.00 | 667% |
| Yield | 0.43 | 2.31 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 14 years | - |
| EMES | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMES and HDB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMES and HDB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMES | 100% | N/A | ||
| HDB - EMES | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| NU - EMES | -1% Poorly correlated | -2.65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | 100% | -2.83% | ||
| BABA - IEMG | 75% Closely correlated | +2.76% | ||
| JD - IEMG | 69% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| BILI - IEMG | 68% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BIDU - IEMG | 66% Loosely correlated | -12.73% | ||
| BZUN - IEMG | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
More | ||||