Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGAX vs RNWHX
EMGAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMGAX vs RNWHX
EMGAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EMGAX (4.01B). EMGAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMGAX (1.48) vs RNWHX (1.14). EMGAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMGAX (32 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMGAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EMGAX (9.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMGAX (1000). EMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.64 vs. RNWHX (19.47). EMGAX return over 5 years is better than : 22.83 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| EMGAX | RNWHX | EMGAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.72 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.72 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.348 | 12.651 | 161% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.01B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 1.14 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.64 | 19.47 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.53 | 43.67 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.83 | 14.04 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 117.73 | 107.31 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement