Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGAX vs RNWHX
EMGAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMGAX vs RNWHX
EMGAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGAX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. EMGAX (3.88B). EMGAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMGAX (1.54) vs RNWHX (1.17). EMGAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMGAX (32 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMGAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EMGAX (9.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGAX: RNWHX (250) vs EMGAX (1000). EMGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.92 vs. RNWHX (21.78). EMGAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.13 vs. RNWHX (17.87).
| EMGAX | RNWHX | EMGAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.72 | 199% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.72 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.077 | 13.978 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.88B | 90.7B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.17 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.92 | 21.78 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.11 | 44.40 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 17.87 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.88 | 107.97 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement