EMGDF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
17.19M
TTSRF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMGDF vs TTSRF

Header iconEMGDF vs TTSRF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs TTSRFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Volume$27.67K
Capitalization17.19M
Tartisan Nickel
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11K
Capitalization7.12M
EMGDF vs TTSRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. TTSRF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and TTSRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.23 vs. TTSRF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and TTSRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 160% vs. TTSRF: 59%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $17.19M vs. TTSRF: $7.12M
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $17.19M. TTSRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $7.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTSRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMGDF and TTSRF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTSRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTSRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTSRF is a better buy in the short-term than EMGDF.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.61% price change this week, while TTSRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMGDF($17.2M) has a higher market cap than TTSRF($7.12M). EMGDF YTD gains are higher at: -19.499 vs. TTSRF (-67.066). EMGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.31M vs. TTSRF (-2.81M). EMGDF has more cash in the bank: 98.9K vs. TTSRF (83.3K). TTSRF has less debt than EMGDF: TTSRF (154) vs EMGDF (100K). EMGDF (0) and TTSRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMGDFTTSRFEMGDF / TTSRF
Capitalization17.2M7.12M242%
EBITDA-1.31M-2.81M47%
Gain YTD-19.499-67.06629%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash98.9K83.3K119%
Total Debt100K15464,935%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TTSRF: Fundamental Ratings
TTSRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
20
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
19
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMGDFTTSRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAKC32.290.18
+0.56%
Oakworth Capital Inc.
YARIY17.920.09
+0.50%
Yara International ASA
BSFFF27.93N/A
N/A
Basic-Fit N.V.
TCBS16.13N/A
N/A
Texas Community Bancshares
SLNFF0.21-0.01
-3.79%
Solution Financial Inc.

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
-4.19%
FLMCF - EMGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - EMGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-26.68%
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
KLDCF - EMGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
More

TTSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTSRF and ZNCXF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTSRF and ZNCXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTSRF
1D Price
Change %
TTSRF100%
+5.77%
ZNCXF - TTSRF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAVNF - TTSRF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.47%
VULNF - TTSRF
2%
Poorly correlated
+19.15%
TROUF - TTSRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMGDF - TTSRF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-4.19%
More