EMGDF
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.65M
ZNCXF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMGDF vs ZNCXF

Header iconEMGDF vs ZNCXF Comparison
Open Charts EMGDF vs ZNCXFBanner chart's image
EMINENT GOLD
Price$0.24
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.52K
Capitalization10.65M
Zincx Res
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization13.47M
EMGDF vs ZNCXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMGDF vs. ZNCXF commentary
May 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGDF is a Hold and ZNCXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 24, 2025
Stock price -- (EMGDF: $0.24 vs. ZNCXF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: EMGDF and ZNCXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMGDF: 28% vs. ZNCXF: 11%
Market capitalization -- EMGDF: $10.65M vs. ZNCXF: $13.47M
EMGDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $10.65M. ZNCXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZNCXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZNCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZNCXF is a better buy in the long-term than EMGDF.

Price Growth

EMGDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.87% price change this week, while ZNCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.29% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZNCXF($13.5M) has a higher market cap than EMGDF($10.6M). ZNCXF YTD gains are higher at: 45.096 vs. EMGDF (-18.584). ZNCXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -657.87K vs. EMGDF (-1.29M). ZNCXF has more cash in the bank: 423K vs. EMGDF (78.2K). ZNCXF has less debt than EMGDF: ZNCXF (37.1K) vs EMGDF (150K). EMGDF (0) and ZNCXF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EMGDFZNCXFEMGDF / ZNCXF
Capitalization10.6M13.5M79%
EBITDA-1.29M-657.87K196%
Gain YTD-18.58445.096-41%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash78.2K423K18%
Total Debt150K37.1K404%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZNCXF: Fundamental Ratings
ZNCXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTSNX143.380.46
+0.32%
Vanguard Total Intl Stock Index I
JEVAX9.370.02
+0.21%
JHancock Disciplined Value Em Mkts Eq A
FCVIX19.12N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value I
JNVMX17.04N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Developed International ValueR6
ADGGX22.47N/A
N/A
American Century Disciplined Growth R5

EMGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMGDF and FLMCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMGDF and FLMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMGDF
1D Price
Change %
EMGDF100%
N/A
FLMCF - EMGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - EMGDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - EMGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
KLDCF - EMGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
More

ZNCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZNCXF and ARAAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZNCXF and ARAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZNCXF
1D Price
Change %
ZNCXF100%
-6.95%
ARAAF - ZNCXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
AVLNF - ZNCXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
TTSRF - ZNCXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRMNF - ZNCXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.70%
EMGDF - ZNCXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More