Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGNX vs RNWHX
EMGNX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMGNX vs RNWHX
EMGNX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGNX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGNX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. EMGNX (4.28B). EMGNX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: EMGNX (1.66) vs RNWHX (1.15). EMGNX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMGNX (16 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMGNX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EMGNX (9.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGNX: RNWHX (250) vs EMGNX (1000000). EMGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.04 vs. RNWHX (30.30). EMGNX return over 5 years is better than : 28.65 vs. RNWHX (19.37).
| EMGNX | RNWHX | EMGNX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.72 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.72 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.217 | 17.535 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.28B | 85.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.15 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.04 | 30.30 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.31 | 57.43 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.65 | 19.37 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.80 | 122.66 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement