Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMGRX vs NAESX
EMGRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts EMGRX vs NAESX
EMGRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMGRX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMGRX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. EMGRX (458M). NAESX pays higher dividends than EMGRX: NAESX (1.08) vs EMGRX (0.00). EMGRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: EMGRX (34 years) vs NAESX (66 years). EMGRX (1.31) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). EMGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMGRX: NAESX (0) vs EMGRX (3000). EMGRX (28.81) and NAESX (27.66) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.59 vs. EMGRX (8.66).
| EMGRX | NAESX | EMGRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.17 | 771% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.547 | 15.348 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.81 | 27.66 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.27 | 57.38 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.66 | 33.59 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.89 | 172.93 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement