Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMILX vs RNWAX
EMILX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMILX vs RNWAX
EMILX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. EMILX (19.4M). EMILX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMILX (0.92) vs RNWAX (0.49). EMILX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMILX (4 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). EMILX (5.33) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). EMILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMILX: RNWAX (250) vs EMILX (1000000). EMILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.66 vs. RNWAX (28.10).
| EMILX | RNWAX | EMILX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.66 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.33 | 1.66 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.048 | 16.269 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.49 | 189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.66 | 28.10 | 219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.99 | 51.54 | 213% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.29 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement