Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMILX vs RNWFX
EMILX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMILX vs RNWFX
EMILX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. EMILX (19.4M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EMILX: RNWFX (1.20) vs EMILX (0.92). EMILX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMILX (4 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). EMILX (5.33) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EMILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMILX: RNWFX (250) vs EMILX (1000000). EMILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.66 vs. RNWFX (29.73).
| EMILX | RNWFX | EMILX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.33 | 0.62 | 860% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.048 | 16.763 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.20 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.66 | 29.73 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.99 | 57.00 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.02 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 124.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement