Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMILX vs RNWHX
EMILX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMILX vs RNWHX
EMILX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. EMILX (18.7M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMILX: RNWHX (1.14) vs EMILX (0.91). EMILX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMILX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMILX (5.33) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMILX: RNWHX (250) vs EMILX (1000000). EMILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.65 vs. RNWHX (20.29).
| EMILX | RNWHX | EMILX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.72 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.33 | 0.72 | 740% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.936 | 14.032 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.7M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.14 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.65 | 20.29 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.55 | 50.36 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.12 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 113.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers