Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMILX vs RNWHX
EMILX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMILX vs RNWHX
EMILX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. EMILX (19.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMILX: RNWHX (1.15) vs EMILX (0.92). EMILX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMILX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMILX (5.33) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMILX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMILX: RNWHX (250) vs EMILX (1000000). EMILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.66 vs. RNWHX (29.50).
| EMILX | RNWHX | EMILX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.72 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.33 | 0.72 | 740% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.048 | 16.719 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.15 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.66 | 29.50 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.99 | 56.33 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 19.26 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 121.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement