EMLP vs MLPX

Key Takeaways

• EMLP is an actively managed fund blending midstream energy infrastructure with a large allocation to regulated utilities, while MLPX is a passive fund that tracks a midstream energy and MLP index.
• MLPX is cheaper at a 0.45% expense ratio versus EMLP's 0.95%, and it carries a higher distribution yield, roughly 4% versus about 2.8%.
• EMLP holds roughly 60+ positions with meaningful utility exposure, whereas MLPX holds about 30 positions concentrated almost entirely in the energy (midstream) sector.
• Top-10 concentration is lower for EMLP (around 45%) than for MLPX (around 66%), reflecting different diversification profiles.
• EMLP applies an environmental, social, and governance (ESG) screen; MLPX offers a purer, low-cost play on pipelines, storage, and processing infrastructure.
• Both funds have historically shown lower volatility (beta) than broad equity markets, but MLPX tends to carry higher drawdown risk from its single-sector energy focus.

Introduction

Energy infrastructure has become a focal point for income-oriented and inflation-aware investors, thanks to durable cash flows from pipelines, storage, and processing assets. EMLP and MLPX both target this space, but they represent different strategies rather than direct clones. EMLP, an actively managed fund, mixes midstream names with regulated electric and gas utilities to temper volatility. MLPX, a passive index tracker, concentrates on pure midstream and master limited partnership (MLP) exposure. Comparing their structure, cost, and sector composition helps investors decide whether they prefer a diversified, utility-heavy approach or a purer, higher-yielding energy infrastructure bet.

First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) Overview

EMLP is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in 2012. It seeks total return by investing at least 80% of net assets in North American energy infrastructure companies, including master limited partnerships (MLPs), MLP affiliates, pipeline operators, utilities, and renewable energy producers. The fund is non-diversified and applies an ESG screen to its selection process.

The portfolio typically holds around 60 positions, with the top 10 representing roughly 45% of assets. Sector allocation is split between utilities (often near 50%) and energy (roughly 40% to 50%), with smaller industrial and materials exposure. Top holdings have recently included EPD, ET, MPLX, PAGP, NFG, KMI, SO, PPL, and OKE. The 0.95% expense ratio reflects active management, and the fund carries a trailing distribution yield near 2.8%.

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) Overview

MLPX is a passive fund that seeks to track the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, providing exposure to midstream energy infrastructure MLPs and corporations. Launched in 2013, it is non-diversified and invests at least 80% of assets in index securities. Its structure allows investors to access MLP-like income without the K-1 tax form complexity often tied to owning individual MLPs directly.

The fund holds roughly 30 positions, with the top 10 concentrated at around 66% of assets and a near-total 100% energy-sector allocation. Leading holdings have recently included WMB, TRP, ENB, TRGP, KMI, OKE, LNG, MPLX, ET, and EPD. Its 0.45% expense ratio is less than half of EMLP's, and its distribution yield is higher, around 4%.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within North American energy infrastructure, a segment shaped by rising natural gas demand, electricity-load growth from data centers and electrification, and the build-out of liquefied natural gas (LNG) export capacity. Midstream operators benefit from fee-based, volume-driven contracts that are less directly tied to daily commodity prices than producers, giving the sector defensive, income-like characteristics.

Recent market cycles have featured persistent demand for energy income, supportive capital-return policies among pipeline operators, and regulatory scrutiny over permitting and rates. Interest-rate expectations matter too: infrastructure and utility cash flows are often valued like bond proxies, so their relative appeal shifts as yields move. Key risks include commodity-price downturns that reduce volumes, financing-cost pressures, and regulatory changes affecting pipelines or utility rate structures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, MLPX has generally shown stronger total returns, reflecting momentum in pure-play midstream names and its higher distribution yield, while EMLP has delivered steadier, lower-volatility performance thanks to its utility allocation. Both funds have historically registered betas well below the broad equity market, but MLPX's single-sector concentration leaves it more exposed to energy-specific drawdowns, while EMLP's diversification into regulated utilities cushions downside.

The relative gap often narrows or widens with sector rotation: when investors favor high-yield energy names, MLPX's concentrated midstream exposure tends to lead; when defensive, utility-heavy positioning is in favor, EMLP's broader mix can hold up better. Cost is a structural headwind for EMLP, whose higher expense ratio must be overcome through active decisions, whereas MLPX's lower fee and higher income give it an efficiency edge in total-return comparisons over time.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics, helping to surface trade ideas, trending names, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to refine your own ETF comparison and relative positioning research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor MLPX in the current environment. Its materially lower 0.45% expense ratio, higher distribution yield, purer midstream exposure, and stronger recent trend consistency give it an edge in both cost efficiency and income generation. EMLP remains the more diversified, lower-volatility option with a defensive utility tilt, but its higher fee and diluted energy exposure make it a more conservative choice rather than a higher-momentum one. Investors prioritizing income and sector momentum may lean toward MLPX, while those seeking reduced drawdown risk and broader diversification may prefer EMLP. This is a probabilistic, structural assessment, not personalized investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations