Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMLP vs UMI
EMLP vs UMI Comparison
Open Charts EMLP vs UMI
EMLP vs UMI Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMLP vs. UMI commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMLP is a Hold and UMI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMLP has more net assets: 4.19B vs. UMI (519M). UMI has a higher annual dividend yield than EMLP: UMI (29.286) vs EMLP (20.076). EMLP was incepted earlier than UMI: EMLP (14 years) vs UMI (5 years). UMI (0.69) has a lower expense ratio than EMLP (0.95). UMI has a higher turnover EMLP (36.00) vs EMLP (36.00).
| EMLP | UMI | EMLP / UMI | |
| Gain YTD | 20.076 | 29.286 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 4.19B | 519M | 807% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.69 | 138% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 41.00 | 88% |
| Yield | 2.79 | 6.00 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMLP | UMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 15 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EMLP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMLP has been closely correlated with BKH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMLP jumps, then BKH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMLP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMLP | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| BKH - EMLP | 73% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| DTE - EMLP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| CNP - EMLP | 71% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| ETR - EMLP | 69% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| AEE - EMLP | 68% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
More | ||||
UMI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMI has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMI jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y