EMM | SPEM | EMM / SPEM | |
Gain YTD | -5.884 | 1.303 | -452% |
Net Assets | 16.9M | 10.5B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.07 | 1,071% |
Turnover | 83.82 | 2.00 | 4,191% |
Yield | 0.84 | 2.73 | 31% |
Fund Existence | 15 years | 18 years | - |
SPEM | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMM and TSM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMM and TSM's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPEM has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPEM jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPEM | 100% | -1.87% | ||
JD - SPEM | 71% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
BILI - SPEM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
BIDU - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | -2.32% | ||
BABA - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
BZUN - SPEM | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.00% | ||
More |