EMN
Price
$58.79
Change
-$13.82 (-19.03%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
11.8B
82 days until earnings call
FUL
Price
$55.60
Change
-$0.60 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
4.35B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EMN vs FUL

Header iconEMN vs FUL Comparison
Open Charts EMN vs FULBanner chart's image
Eastman Chemical
Price$58.79
Change-$13.82 (-19.03%)
Volume$7.42M
Capitalization11.8B
HB Fuller
Price$55.60
Change-$0.60 (-1.07%)
Volume$510.63K
Capitalization4.35B
EMN vs FUL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMN vs. FUL commentary
Aug 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMN is a Hold and FUL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2025
Stock price -- (EMN: $58.79 vs. FUL: $55.60)
Brand notoriety: EMN and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMN: 369% vs. FUL: 119%
Market capitalization -- EMN: $11.8B vs. FUL: $4.35B
EMN [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $11.8B. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMN and FUL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than EMN.

Price Growth

EMN (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -24.93% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -6.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMN is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-4.37% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMN($11.8B) has a higher market cap than FUL($4.35B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than EMN: FUL (28.70) vs EMN (13.39). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -16.601 vs. EMN (-34.336). EMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.81B vs. FUL (540M). EMN has more cash in the bank: 548M vs. FUL (165M). FUL has less debt than EMN: FUL (1.83B) vs EMN (4.85B). EMN has higher revenues than FUL: EMN (9.21B) vs FUL (3.51B).
EMNFULEMN / FUL
Capitalization11.8B4.35B272%
EBITDA1.81B540M335%
Gain YTD-34.336-16.601207%
P/E Ratio13.3928.7047%
Revenue9.21B3.51B262%
Total Cash548M165M332%
Total Debt4.85B1.83B265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMN vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
EMN
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5660
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
5281
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6463
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMN's Valuation (16) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as EMN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

EMN's SMR Rating (52) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FUL (81) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that EMN’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as EMN (64) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to EMN’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMN (90) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMNFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EICIX18.45N/A
N/A
EIC Value Institutional
VMGMX125.35N/A
N/A
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth Index Admiral
SMDRX19.57N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps SDR
PIIMX30.98N/A
N/A
Principal Glb Emerging Markets R6
RSGFX11.59N/A
N/A
Victory RS Select Growth C

EMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMN has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMN jumps, then DD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMN
1D Price
Change %
EMN100%
-19.03%
DD - EMN
77%
Closely correlated
-2.73%
LYB - EMN
76%
Closely correlated
-7.79%
AVNT - EMN
76%
Closely correlated
+7.03%
HUN - EMN
73%
Closely correlated
-5.05%
DOW - EMN
70%
Closely correlated
-8.90%
More

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with KWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then KWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
-1.07%
KWR - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
SCL - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
PPG - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
KOP - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
EMN - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
-19.03%
More