RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. EMOLX (19.2M). EMOLX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMOLX (0.95) vs RNWAX (0.49). EMOLX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMOLX (5 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). EMOLX (5.30) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). EMOLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). EMOLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: EMOLX (0) vs RNWAX (250). EMOLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.76 vs. RNWAX (15.91).

	EMOLX	RNWAX	EMOLX / RNWAX
Total Expense Ratio	0.87	1.66	52%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	5.30	1.66	319%
Fund Existence	5 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	27.745	15.694	177%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	19.2M	90B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.95	0.49	194%
Returns for 1 year	35.76	15.91	225%
Returns for 3 years	102.37	49.14	208%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	12.78	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	101.85	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
OANMX	187.34	1.41	+0.76%
Oakmark Institutional
DPREX	14.75	0.01	+0.07%
Nomura Global Listed Real Assets A
FBLAX	13.41	N/A	N/A
Franklin Managed Income A
ASEFX	17.82	N/A	N/A
Nuveen Small Cap Select R6
GSWPX	24.41	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth P