RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. EMOLX (19.2M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EMOLX: RNWFX (1.20) vs EMOLX (0.95). EMOLX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMOLX (5 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). EMOLX (5.30) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EMOLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). EMOLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: EMOLX (0) vs RNWFX (250). EMOLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.76 vs. RNWFX (17.39).

	EMOLX	RNWFX	EMOLX / RNWFX
Total Expense Ratio	0.87	0.62	140%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	5.30	0.62	855%
Fund Existence	5 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	27.745	16.517	168%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	19.2M	90B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.95	1.20	79%
Returns for 1 year	35.76	17.39	206%
Returns for 3 years	102.37	54.50	188%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	18.43	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	114.22	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
HRCAX	116.75	N/A	N/A
Harbor Capital Appreciation Admin
LMCPX	34.63	N/A	N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock P
FFEFX	17.25	N/A	N/A
Nuveen Dividend Value R6
PGIRX	20.22	N/A	N/A
Polen Global Growth Investor
MAVKX	16.29	N/A	N/A
MoA Small Cap Value Fund