Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMOLX vs RNWFX
EMOLX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMOLX vs RNWFX
EMOLX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 85.6B vs. EMOLX (19.4M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than EMOLX: RNWFX (1.20) vs EMOLX (0.92). EMOLX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: EMOLX (4 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). EMOLX (5.30) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). EMOLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). EMOLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: EMOLX (0) vs RNWFX (250). EMOLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 61.69 vs. RNWFX (29.73).
| EMOLX | RNWFX | EMOLX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 5.30 | 0.62 | 855% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.062 | 16.763 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.4M | 85.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.20 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 61.69 | 29.73 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.36 | 57.00 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.02 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 124.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement