RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. EMOLX (18.8M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMOLX: RNWHX (1.17) vs EMOLX (0.98). EMOLX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMOLX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMOLX (5.30) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMOLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). EMOLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EMOLX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EMOLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.00 vs. RNWHX (22.38).

	EMOLX	RNWHX	EMOLX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	0.87	0.72	121%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	5.30	0.72	736%
Fund Existence	4 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	28.377	17.024	167%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	18.8M	88.6B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.98	1.17	84%
Returns for 1 year	44.00	22.38	197%
Returns for 3 years	105.95	55.91	190%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	22.98	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	108.52	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
MSGUX	50.24	1.30	+2.66%
Morgan Stanley Inst Growth C
VDSIX	27.38	0.15	+0.55%
Victory Diversified Stock I
PBQQX	28.52	0.14	+0.49%
PGIM Jennison Blend R6
TNVDX	10.77	0.02	+0.17%
1290 Loomis Sayles Multi-Asset Income I
FZANX	54.08	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Advisor New Insights Z