RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. EMOLX (19.2M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMOLX: RNWHX (1.15) vs EMOLX (0.95). EMOLX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMOLX (5 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). EMOLX (5.30) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). EMOLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). EMOLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: EMOLX (0) vs RNWHX (250). EMOLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.76 vs. RNWHX (17.19).

	EMOLX	RNWHX	EMOLX / RNWHX
Total Expense Ratio	0.87	0.72	121%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	5.30	0.72	736%
Fund Existence	5 years	11 years	-
Gain YTD	27.745	16.447	169%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	19.2M	90B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.95	1.15	83%
Returns for 1 year	35.76	17.19	208%
Returns for 3 years	102.37	53.84	190%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	17.68	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	111.44	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
FLPEX	46.31	0.28	+0.61%
Fidelity Advisor Low-Priced Stock C
FACDX	64.25	N/A	N/A
Fidelity Advisor Health Care A
EXHAX	26.61	N/A	N/A
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S
LMCFX	35.98	N/A	N/A
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F
MSAWX	22.51	N/A	N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Asia Opp C