META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EMOT | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 21 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QUBX | 6.49 | 0.08 | +1.25% |
| Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF | |||
| PSMD | 35.12 | 0.10 | +0.28% |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (January) ETF | |||
| BUFG | 29.98 | -0.09 | -0.31% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allocation Gr ETF | |||
| FLQM | 60.78 | -0.32 | -0.52% |
| Franklin US Mid Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF | |||
| JFLI | 53.93 | -0.30 | -0.55% |
| JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMOT and HPQ have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMOT and HPQ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMOT | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| HPQ - EMOT | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
| ADBE - EMOT | 8% Poorly correlated | -6.73% | ||
| META - EMOT | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
| AAPL - EMOT | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.51% | ||
| MTD - EMOT | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | +1.00% | ||
| DASH - META | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.63% | ||
| THRY - META | 56% Loosely correlated | +8.33% | ||
| TWLO - META | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| SMWB - META | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| RDDT - META | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||