EMR
Price
$121.85
Change
-$2.90 (-2.32%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
64.91B
67 days until earnings call
FLS
Price
$55.39
Change
-$2.07 (-3.60%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.99B
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EMR vs FLS

Header iconEMR vs FLS Comparison
Open Charts EMR vs FLSBanner chart's image
Emerson Electric
Price$121.85
Change-$2.90 (-2.32%)
Volume$2.33M
Capitalization64.91B
Flowserve
Price$55.39
Change-$2.07 (-3.60%)
Volume$2M
Capitalization5.99B
EMR vs FLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMR vs. FLS commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMR is a Hold and FLS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (EMR: $124.75 vs. FLS: $57.46)
Brand notoriety: EMR and FLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMR: 48% vs. FLS: 148%
Market capitalization -- EMR: $64.91B vs. FLS: $5.99B
EMR [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $64.91B. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $5.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMR is a better buy in the long-term than FLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than EMR.

Price Growth

EMR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -8.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

EMR is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

FLS is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.33% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMR($64.9B) has a higher market cap than FLS($5.99B). EMR (33.30) and FLS (32.38) have similar P/E ratio . EMR YTD gains are higher at: 1.087 vs. FLS (-0.104). EMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.93B vs. FLS (374M). EMR has more cash in the bank: 2.08B vs. FLS (546M). FLS has less debt than EMR: FLS (1.41B) vs EMR (11.5B). EMR has higher revenues than FLS: EMR (15.9B) vs FLS (4.32B).
EMRFLSEMR / FLS
Capitalization64.9B5.99B1,083%
EBITDA3.93B374M1,052%
Gain YTD1.087-0.104-1,042%
P/E Ratio33.3032.38103%
Revenue15.9B4.32B368%
Total Cash2.08B546M380%
Total Debt11.5B1.41B819%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMR vs FLS: Fundamental Ratings
EMR
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
974
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1751
SMR RATING
1..100
6258
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3969
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EMR's Valuation (41) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as FLS (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

EMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (62) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (49) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.

EMR's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as FLS (69) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EMRFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWY58.460.18
+0.31%
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
LQIG94.500.17
+0.18%
SPDR MarketAxess Inv Grd 400 Corp Bd ETF
ECML32.41-0.17
-0.52%
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
BKMC104.47-0.94
-0.89%
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
DAT46.15-1.10
-2.34%
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF

EMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMR has been closely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMR jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMR
1D Price
Change %
EMR100%
+0.26%
FLS - EMR
67%
Closely correlated
-2.61%
PH - EMR
67%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
ITT - EMR
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
NPO - EMR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
DOV - EMR
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
More

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
-2.61%
ITT - FLS
72%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
NPO - FLS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
EMR - FLS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
CR - FLS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
More