This comparison examines Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO), two established industrial companies whose stocks appeal to investors seeking exposure to manufacturing, infrastructure, and automation themes. The analysis targets traders monitoring relative performance and positioning within the industrials sector, as well as longer-term investors evaluating business models, growth drivers, and risk factors in the current environment. By contrasting scale, end markets, and recent price behavior, the review provides context for assessing how each stock aligns with varying risk tolerances and portfolio objectives.
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) provides automation solutions, measurement technologies, and industrial software across process, hybrid, and discrete manufacturing markets. In recent weeks, the stock has traded within a range influenced by broader industrial sentiment and mixed economic indicators. Performance has shown resilience in certain segments tied to energy and infrastructure, though overall returns have lagged the S&P 500. Key influences on sentiment include steady demand for automation amid ongoing digital transformation initiatives and cautious capital expenditure patterns reported by customers. The company’s diversified portfolio has helped buffer volatility compared to more cyclical peers, supporting a measured outlook during recent market activity.
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) manufactures welding products, cutting systems, and related equipment primarily serving fabrication, construction, and heavy industry applications. Over recent market activity, the stock has exhibited relative stability with performance reflecting steady underlying demand in manufacturing sectors. Results have been supported by consistent order flow and operational efficiency, though exposure to commodity price fluctuations and global trade dynamics has contributed to periodic swings. Recent earnings trends indicate the company has generally aligned with or modestly surpassed analyst projections, helping sustain investor interest despite sector headwinds affecting broader industrials.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Bots feature varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker universes, with many showing annualized returns in competitive ranges alongside defined drawdown statistics. This resource enables users to explore data-driven approaches tailored to different risk profiles and market environments. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) differ markedly in business scope and scale. (EMR) emphasizes broad automation and control technologies with exposure to energy, life sciences, and discrete manufacturing, while (LECO) concentrates on welding and cutting solutions tied closely to metal fabrication and construction cycles. Recent momentum has favored (LECO) on a one-year basis, though both have posted comparable year-to-date results amid shared industrial sector pressures. Risk factors include (EMR)’s sensitivity to global supply chains and technology adoption rates versus (LECO)’s greater vulnerability to raw material costs and cyclical manufacturing demand. Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism for both, with valuations incorporating expectations of sustained infrastructure and reshoring trends, yet tempered by uncertainty around interest rates and economic growth.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning within current market conditions, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest edge to Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) due to its stronger recent one-year performance and alignment with fabrication demand. However, Emerson Electric Co. (EMR)’s larger scale and diversification could support more stable outcomes in varied environments. Any preference remains probabilistic and contingent on evolving data rather than a definitive ranking.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLECO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LECO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
EMR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -4.37% price change this week, while LECO (@Tools & Hardware) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -4.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.02%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.
EMR is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
LECO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Tools & Hardware (-3.65% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
| EMR | LECO | EMR / LECO | |
| Capitalization | 75.8B | 13.8B | 549% |
| EBITDA | 5.05B | 849M | 595% |
| Gain YTD | 2.810 | 5.477 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.34 | 25.92 | 121% |
| Revenue | 18.3B | 4.35B | 421% |
| Total Cash | 1.79B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 1.31B | 1,076% |
EMR | LECO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMR's Valuation (21) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LECO (79) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LECO’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (41) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's SMR Rating (25) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMR (64) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMR’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (57) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.
LECO's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (74) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that LECO’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.
| EMR | LECO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 4 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 28 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 4 days ago 53% |